Skip to content

Bob Caswell

Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and gamer

  • Home
  • About
  • Toggle search form

YouTube Video Quality Soon Will Not Suck

Posted on March 11, 2008 By Bob Caswell 10 Comments on YouTube Video Quality Soon Will Not Suck

YouTubeApparently YouTube is on the verge of making a big announcement since there seems to have been an announcement about the announcement (nice way to get double the press). And search engine Mahalo has already created a page dedicated to news on “YouTube High Quality” with a video (embedded below) showing an example of how it would work. All I can say is finally! Here’s hoping that’s the big announcement. I love YouTube, but man, can you think of a place online to watch lower quality video?

*Update* Here’s a screenshot of the YouTube video with the high quality option. (Look right under the video for the new link that says “Watch this video in higher quality.”)

*Update 2* YouTube made its big announcement here, and it has to do more with developers.

YouTube High Quality

Media, Tech News, Web 2.0 Tags:Mahalo, online-video, YouTube

Post navigation

Previous Post: My First MySpace Friend: SPAM
Next Post: The Economist Talks Digg Strategy and Adds Comments

More Related Articles

14 Countries Have More Cellphone Subscribers than People Gadgets
Sony’s Latest Hope: Offer Movie Downloads Gadgets
The 12-Step Program for Email Addicts Do-It-Yourself Tech
World’s Best Corporate Reputations: Apple #22, Google #4, & Microsoft #1 Apple
A Beginner’s Guide to Community Driven Web Content Do-It-Yourself Tech
Results of Radiohead Experiment: 38% of Downloaders Pay an Average of $6 Music

Comments (10) on “YouTube Video Quality Soon Will Not Suck”

  1. Paul Ellis says:
    March 11, 2008 at 8:53 pm

    For those who don’t want to write down the HQ video link at the end of the video here it is.

    And to answer your question, no, I can’t think of a place to watch lower quality video on the web.

  2. Paul Ellis says:
    March 11, 2008 at 9:08 pm

    Another note on this. I analyzed the video stream and the codec is still “Flash Video” (aka Sorensen Spark) not a higher quality one like h264.

    Here is the breakdown on the differences in quality for the video in the link:

    Video Resolution: 448×336 (about twice as many pixels)
    Video Bitrate: 628kbps
    Audio Codec and Bitrate: mono MP3 96kbps (way higher quality)
    Audio Sample Rate: 44khz

    Video Resolution: 320×240
    Video Bitrate: 315kbps
    Audio Codec and Bitrate: mono MP3 8kbps
    Audio Sample Rate: 22khz

  3. Paul Ellis says:
    March 11, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    Ok, my last comment for a while. This isn’t the only “HQ” video out there on Youtube. Here are some more “HQ” videos.

  4. Paul Ellis says:
    March 12, 2008 at 12:01 am

    One more tidbit I found. If you add &fmt=6 to the end of the video’s link (often even ones that don’t show the option to switch HQ) it will load the HQ version. If you do &fmt=18 it will load an MP4/h264 version. There isn’t always a HQ or MP4 version however. The example below only has standard and MP4, no HQ FLV.

    Example:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpMu6yyH6pY
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpMu6yyH6pY&fmt=18

  5. Joseph says:
    May 2, 2008 at 2:40 am

    I can barely see a difference. Maybe the sound is a bit better, but the quality still sucks. I dont know how youtube got so popular. Some body could have created a site just like youtube, and had perfect video quality. Infact that can be done now, and youtube wont be so dominant anymore.

    But still, I think youtube should have high definition video quality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Computers
  • Cyberlaw
  • Do-It-Yourself Tech
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Google
  • Internet
  • Just For Fun
  • Media
  • Microsoft
  • Music
  • Netflix
  • Privacy
  • Shopping
  • Sony
  • Tech News
  • Tech Reviews
  • Web 2.0
  • Yahoo

Copyright © 2026 Bob Caswell.

Powered by PressBook Green WordPress theme

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}