Skip to content

Bob Caswell

Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and gamer

  • Home
  • About
  • Toggle search form

Google Accused of Going Evil, Google Employee Responds by Sidestepping the Issue

Posted on December 30, 2006August 20, 2008 By Bob Caswell No Comments on Google Accused of Going Evil, Google Employee Responds by Sidestepping the Issue

Googlelogo_5 Blake Ross, cofounder of Firefox, spent part of his Christmas explaining his dissatisfaction with Google due to its latest move: displaying “tips” (allegedly not ads, you decide; see screenshot below) right above search results that point searchers to Google Calendar, Blogger and Picasa for any search phrase that includes calendar, blog, and photo sharing.

Googletip

Ross claims that this is bad for competitors and is a bad sign for Google. Ross acknowledges that Yahoo and Ask have done this before but points out that they didn’t build their businesses on the promise of being unconventionally trustworthy. Others are calling Google evil, a play on the “not being evil” mantra that attracted attention when the company first went public.

What’s especially distasteful is the fact that just weeks earlier (on December 7), Google proudly proclaimed that it uses the same ad system as any competitor to promote its products and services:

“It’s important to note, however, that our ads are created and managed under the exact same guidelines, principles, practices and algorithms as the ads of any other advertiser. Likewise, we use the very same tools and account interface.”

The part not mentioned is the simple act of calling something a “tip” rather than an “ad” allowing Google to use different guidelines and principles to have an unfair advantage over the competition.

I am no stranger to worrying about Google and wondering if, despite the aforementioned “not being evil” mantra, the company is headed into Microsoft territory. Though this time around it would be worse, as Google would get [is getting] the added benefit of being called hypocritical in the process.

But the story doesn’t stop there. Matt Cutts of I-work-at-Google-but-say-what-I-want fame decided to post his thoughts on this latest Google move. Interestingly enough, he claims to agree with Ross, though he really never deals directly with the trust issue or the part involving the Google statement made just weeks earlier.

Cutts whole shpeal revolves around the fact that these new “tips” are not very relevant or targeted. Well, that’s great that the “tips” should be removed due to lack of relevance, but what about Google acting hypocritically, Matt?

I agree with Google Blogoscoped and like how Valleywag’s Nick Douglas once put it: credibility is like virginity.

Internet, Microsoft, Tech News

Post navigation

Previous Post: Online Ad Wars: Who will win in 2007? Google, Yahoo, or Microsoft?
Next Post: AT&T Killing the Cingular Name & Avoiding Net Neutrality

More Related Articles

Amazon: Sales Tax Hasn’t Stopped Me Yet Amazon
Microsoft Hopes to Release Windows for $100 Laptop Next Year Internet
Google Buys YouTube for $1.65 Billion Google
Computers Coming Preloaded with More Crapware Than Ever Before Apple
Sony Charges $50 Extra to Sell You Laptop with No Crapware Computers
Microsoft Offers Cash Back to Searchers, But for How Long? Internet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Amazon
  • Apple
  • Computers
  • Cyberlaw
  • Do-It-Yourself Tech
  • Gadgets
  • Gaming
  • Google
  • Internet
  • Just For Fun
  • Media
  • Microsoft
  • Music
  • Netflix
  • Privacy
  • Shopping
  • Sony
  • Tech News
  • Tech Reviews
  • Web 2.0
  • Yahoo

Copyright © 2026 Bob Caswell.

Powered by PressBook Green WordPress theme

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}