<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3: Impressions, Issues, and Verdict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/</link>
	<description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dash Express: When The Internet &#38; GPS Are Combined &#124; Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Dash Express: When The Internet &#38; GPS Are Combined &#124; Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>[...] what&#8217;s even better is the browser plugin (I use Firefox). This makes it so that any address I find anywhere online I just highlight, right click, and click [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what&#8217;s even better is the browser plugin (I use Firefox). This makes it so that any address I find anywhere online I just highlight, right click, and click [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>something is odd though... the thing I hated most while tracking FF3 development, has become one of the key features to me: the interface design.
Now that FF is out, I realized that it can be tweaked to look awesome. You might want to click on my name above to see a screenshot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>something is odd though&#8230; the thing I hated most while tracking FF3 development, has become one of the key features to me: the interface design.<br />
Now that FF is out, I realized that it can be tweaked to look awesome. You might want to click on my name above to see a screenshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ellis</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>The Wand is an auto form filler and username/password manager. The password manager is pretty normal, but the auto form filler is a lot more sophisticated than other ones like the Google toolbar&#039;s implementation. Most auto form fillers will only let you fill the entire form or really just the parts of the form that it thinks are a name, address, phone, etc.

With the Wand if I am in any arbitrary form (like for posting a comment on a blog) and I type &quot;P&quot; it will have a drop down with Paul, Paul Ellis, and paul@notmyrealemailaddress.com. If I type &quot;h&quot; it will pop-up http://www.techconsumer.com. Basically any field can be filled with anything from my Wand information. It even has a few &quot;other&quot; fields for any other information you enter regularly (multiple usernames, alternate address, etc).

It is a lot better than any other implementation I&#039;ve used, and it comes built-in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wand is an auto form filler and username/password manager. The password manager is pretty normal, but the auto form filler is a lot more sophisticated than other ones like the Google toolbar&#8217;s implementation. Most auto form fillers will only let you fill the entire form or really just the parts of the form that it thinks are a name, address, phone, etc.</p>
<p>With the Wand if I am in any arbitrary form (like for posting a comment on a blog) and I type &#8220;P&#8221; it will have a drop down with Paul, Paul Ellis, and <a href="mailto:paul@notmyrealemailaddress.com">paul@notmyrealemailaddress.com</a>. If I type &#8220;h&#8221; it will pop-up <a href="http://www.techconsumer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techconsumer.com</a>. Basically any field can be filled with anything from my Wand information. It even has a few &#8220;other&#8221; fields for any other information you enter regularly (multiple usernames, alternate address, etc).</p>
<p>It is a lot better than any other implementation I&#8217;ve used, and it comes built-in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Alex. I&#039;ll have to give that a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Alex. I&#8217;ll have to give that a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex R.</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Bob-

Try the nightly tester tools extension--it allows you to force an extension to work.  It works for me about 75% of the time with no problems:

http://www.oxymoronical.com/web/firefox/nightly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob-</p>
<p>Try the nightly tester tools extension&#8211;it allows you to force an extension to work.  It works for me about 75% of the time with no problems:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oxymoronical.com/web/firefox/nightly" rel="nofollow">http://www.oxymoronical.com/web/firefox/nightly</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Paul, what&#039; the &quot;Wand&quot; feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Paul, what&#8217; the &#8220;Wand&#8221; feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Good comments. I feel like my point is confirmed by the way others handle the same problem. A x.0 release is no excuse for not having a fundamental issue resolved (i.e., giving the user the chance to know which existing extensions will work before the install, not after).

The portable work around is a nice way to try before committing, but it&#039;s just that: a work around. The fact that users have to jump through hoops for these kinds of things should have Mozilla rethinking the process.

Also, I should note that someone from Mozilla contacted me with some good news. Firefox 2 will soon offer users a chance to update (2.0.x -&gt; 3.0.x) and will tell people which of their add-ons are not compatible before offering the update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments. I feel like my point is confirmed by the way others handle the same problem. A x.0 release is no excuse for not having a fundamental issue resolved (i.e., giving the user the chance to know which existing extensions will work before the install, not after).</p>
<p>The portable work around is a nice way to try before committing, but it&#8217;s just that: a work around. The fact that users have to jump through hoops for these kinds of things should have Mozilla rethinking the process.</p>
<p>Also, I should note that someone from Mozilla contacted me with some good news. Firefox 2 will soon offer users a chance to update (2.0.x -> 3.0.x) and will tell people which of their add-ons are not compatible before offering the update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Price</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I went to portableapps.org, downloaded portable Firefox 3.0, and tried to install all my extensions.  Tab Mix Pro still isn&#039;t ready.  My theme (Noia Extreme 2.0) isn&#039;t ready, and I haven&#039;t found a good theme I like that runs on FF3 yet.  So I&#039;m still running FF2 until these items get resovled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I went to portableapps.org, downloaded portable Firefox 3.0, and tried to install all my extensions.  Tab Mix Pro still isn&#8217;t ready.  My theme (Noia Extreme 2.0) isn&#8217;t ready, and I haven&#8217;t found a good theme I like that runs on FF3 yet.  So I&#8217;m still running FF2 until these items get resovled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob - if you so much rely on all those extensions and bookmarks, why do you care for a x.0 version software anyway? Not to mention beta releases. There&#039;s a reason for all the warnings included in alpha and beta testing. I faced similar problems you did but didn&#039;t care the least at this point in time. In 60 days most of these problems will be history. Anyways - although I had quite some 3.0 crashes, my verdict is the same: best browser I&#039;ve used to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob &#8211; if you so much rely on all those extensions and bookmarks, why do you care for a x.0 version software anyway? Not to mention beta releases. There&#8217;s a reason for all the warnings included in alpha and beta testing. I faced similar problems you did but didn&#8217;t care the least at this point in time. In 60 days most of these problems will be history. Anyways &#8211; although I had quite some 3.0 crashes, my verdict is the same: best browser I&#8217;ve used to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ellis</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2008/06/25/firefox-3-impressions-issues-and-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=930#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually been trying Opera 9.5 (my first time using Opera BTW) recently, and I think you&#039;d like it. I&#039;ll have to do a write-up sometime soon. It is fast, and almost everything I&#039;d use an extension (content/ad-block, Firebug, form autofill, etc) to do in FF is built-in in Opera. Most of the new features in/for Firefox (awesome bar, Weave browser sync, improved file transfer management, session support, full page zoom, etc) were already available in Opera too. Some, like the Wand feature, aren&#039;t even really available for FF.

It imported all of my bookmarks (even though I had used Firefox 3 betas :) from FF too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually been trying Opera 9.5 (my first time using Opera BTW) recently, and I think you&#8217;d like it. I&#8217;ll have to do a write-up sometime soon. It is fast, and almost everything I&#8217;d use an extension (content/ad-block, Firebug, form autofill, etc) to do in FF is built-in in Opera. Most of the new features in/for Firefox (awesome bar, Weave browser sync, improved file transfer management, session support, full page zoom, etc) were already available in Opera too. Some, like the Wand feature, aren&#8217;t even really available for FF.</p>
<p>It imported all of my bookmarks (even though I had used Firefox 3 betas <img src='http://bobcaswell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  from FF too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
