<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&#8217;t Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/</link>
	<description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netflix TV Boxes Coming Soon + Netflix via Gaming Consoles &#124; Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-3572</link>
		<dc:creator>Netflix TV Boxes Coming Soon + Netflix via Gaming Consoles &#124; Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-3572</guid>
		<description>[...] our previous coverage as to why Blockbuster has serious issues and why Netflix is likely the best platform for receiving movie and TV entertainment. Also related, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our previous coverage as to why Blockbuster has serious issues and why Netflix is likely the best platform for receiving movie and TV entertainment. Also related, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&#8217;t Work &#124; TechConsumer</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Blockbuster Total Access Doesn&#8217;t Work &#124; TechConsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: This article is cross-posted at BobCaswell.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: This article is cross-posted at BobCaswell.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Total  Access  was an  economically artifical  service.  I don&#039;t know what they were thinking.    BB   tried  movie pass a  few years ago for  $25 to $30 a month  with  2 or 3 disc  unlimited  from the stores,  but  hardly 2 million  signed up and they  discontinued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total  Access  was an  economically artifical  service.  I don&#8217;t know what they were thinking.    BB   tried  movie pass a  few years ago for  $25 to $30 a month  with  2 or 3 disc  unlimited  from the stores,  but  hardly 2 million  signed up and they  discontinued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny, Fred, considering many who follow this might think Blockbuster&#039;s traditional model was doomed for failure. But for all their pseudo-progressiveness, maybe they should have just stuck with the status-quo...

Hindsight is always 20-20, but it seems hard to believe that they&#039;d be worse off than they are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny, Fred, considering many who follow this might think Blockbuster&#8217;s traditional model was doomed for failure. But for all their pseudo-progressiveness, maybe they should have just stuck with the status-quo&#8230;</p>
<p>Hindsight is always 20-20, but it seems hard to believe that they&#8217;d be worse off than they are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1026</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1026</guid>
		<description>I honestly feel that had blockbuster put late fees back in place and had all new release rentals as 1 night rentals- they&#039;d be back in the cash, keeping it at $17.99 for 3-out unlimited exchanges.

That would&#039;ve been the best business move ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly feel that had blockbuster put late fees back in place and had all new release rentals as 1 night rentals- they&#8217;d be back in the cash, keeping it at $17.99 for 3-out unlimited exchanges.</p>
<p>That would&#8217;ve been the best business move ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Earnest, unfortunately Blockbuster seems to be scrambling a bit, not knowing what to do next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Earnest, unfortunately Blockbuster seems to be scrambling a bit, not knowing what to do next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earnest</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Earnest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>Blockbuster customers overwhelmingly prefer new releases to older catalog movies. I work in LA, movie capitol of America, right? I remember when we removed the foreign section from our store on Larchmont. The customers, save for a couple, didn&#039;t even notice! So, of course, the Blockbuster Total Access catalog is skewed toward new releases, but the actual sizes of the comparative catalogs is pretty close. Especially considering that Blockbuster will ship videos directly out of its stores-- it doesn&#039;t do that as much as its warehouse capacity has increased, but for a while many of the stores were shipping out catalog titles at a surprising pace!

The beauty of the Total Access program was that it offered a convenient blend of catalog movies available anytime and new releases since you could exchange your rentals for New Releases in the store. Within the past few months, customers even had the option of having movies rented in the store automatically removed from their queues. The real problem with that is that our No Late Fees policy absolutely decimated the in-store supply of New Releases! No one brings them back!

It really saddens me that Blockbuster is deemphasizing Total Access. It was one of the few areas where I could, for a while anyway, say &quot;See? This is something Blockbuster got right!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blockbuster customers overwhelmingly prefer new releases to older catalog movies. I work in LA, movie capitol of America, right? I remember when we removed the foreign section from our store on Larchmont. The customers, save for a couple, didn&#8217;t even notice! So, of course, the Blockbuster Total Access catalog is skewed toward new releases, but the actual sizes of the comparative catalogs is pretty close. Especially considering that Blockbuster will ship videos directly out of its stores&#8211; it doesn&#8217;t do that as much as its warehouse capacity has increased, but for a while many of the stores were shipping out catalog titles at a surprising pace!</p>
<p>The beauty of the Total Access program was that it offered a convenient blend of catalog movies available anytime and new releases since you could exchange your rentals for New Releases in the store. Within the past few months, customers even had the option of having movies rented in the store automatically removed from their queues. The real problem with that is that our No Late Fees policy absolutely decimated the in-store supply of New Releases! No one brings them back!</p>
<p>It really saddens me that Blockbuster is deemphasizing Total Access. It was one of the few areas where I could, for a while anyway, say &#8220;See? This is something Blockbuster got right!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movies Mailed</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/12/21/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Movies Mailed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/04/13/the-blockbuster-total-access-fallacy/#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>Netflix does seem to have a lot more die-hard fans than Blockbuster. Either way this competition keeps the prices low for everyone.

Netflix has also taken a lot more proactive role in nurturing young movie producers with their program - I think it&#039;s called Red Envelope or something similar - where they encourage and finance independent films. Blockbuster is a bit more about the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netflix does seem to have a lot more die-hard fans than Blockbuster. Either way this competition keeps the prices low for everyone.</p>
<p>Netflix has also taken a lot more proactive role in nurturing young movie producers with their program &#8211; I think it&#8217;s called Red Envelope or something similar &#8211; where they encourage and finance independent films. Blockbuster is a bit more about the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

