<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radiohead Responds to Download Stats: Says They&#8217;re False</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/</link>
	<description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radiohead Responds to Download Stats: Says They&#8217;re False &#124; TechConsumer</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>Radiohead Responds to Download Stats: Says They&#8217;re False &#124; TechConsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: This article is cross-posted at BobCaswell.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: This article is cross-posted at BobCaswell.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOL</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>LOL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>If you already paid for the low bitrate but you want the better quality bitrate, then download it. You&#039;ve already paid for the right to listen to the music, I&#039;m sure you can find it somewhere. No issue.

I believe they announced the CD at the same time as the download? Except the download got all the hype so no one knew. I can see someone who would have preferred to buy a hardcopy but donated would be upset, but this is not an issue with the overall distribution model - just this one time. Because next time everyone will realize that they&#039;ll probably release a CD too, and you can decide weather to buy that or just get a download.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you already paid for the low bitrate but you want the better quality bitrate, then download it. You&#8217;ve already paid for the right to listen to the music, I&#8217;m sure you can find it somewhere. No issue.</p>
<p>I believe they announced the CD at the same time as the download? Except the download got all the hype so no one knew. I can see someone who would have preferred to buy a hardcopy but donated would be upset, but this is not an issue with the overall distribution model &#8211; just this one time. Because next time everyone will realize that they&#8217;ll probably release a CD too, and you can decide weather to buy that or just get a download.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radiohead Gives Up On Free But Cold Play Gives It a Try &#124; TechConsumer</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Radiohead Gives Up On Free But Cold Play Gives It a Try &#124; TechConsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 12:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>[...] Radiohead never did reveal sales figures from its experiment and even responded to a third party study (calling the results false). In contrast, Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor was willing to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radiohead never did reveal sales figures from its experiment and even responded to a third party study (calling the results false). In contrast, Nine Inch Nails frontman Trent Reznor was willing to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How To: Get Consumers to Buy CDs Instead of MP3s &#124; TechConsumer</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>How To: Get Consumers to Buy CDs Instead of MP3s &#124; TechConsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-920</guid>
		<description>[...] about to claim that it&#8217;s automatically worth it for all bands to do this. But while Radiohead gets buzz for experimenting with new forms of distribution, I thought I should mention a perhaps overlooked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about to claim that it&#8217;s automatically worth it for all bands to do this. But while Radiohead gets buzz for experimenting with new forms of distribution, I thought I should mention a perhaps overlooked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SANICE</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>SANICE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 15:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>PLEASE SOMONE HELP ME. I GO TO THIS SITE WHIT GOOGLE SEARCH I SEARCHING SOME PROGRAM NAME IS STAT CHANGER FOR WORLD OF WARCKRAFT I NEED THAT PROGRAM BUT CANT FIDN  . SO IS GOOD SITE BUT IF SOMONE  HAVE THIS PROGRAM STAT CHANGER SEND ME TO EMAIL MY EMAIL ADRESS IS KOBA_GORDELADZE@MAIL.RU 10X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE SOMONE HELP ME. I GO TO THIS SITE WHIT GOOGLE SEARCH I SEARCHING SOME PROGRAM NAME IS STAT CHANGER FOR WORLD OF WARCKRAFT I NEED THAT PROGRAM BUT CANT FIDN  . SO IS GOOD SITE BUT IF SOMONE  HAVE THIS PROGRAM STAT CHANGER SEND ME TO EMAIL MY EMAIL ADRESS IS <a href="mailto:KOBA_GORDELADZE@MAIL.RU">KOBA_GORDELADZE@MAIL.RU</a> 10X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little sara</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>little sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 01:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-916</guid>
		<description>blah blah blah, these guys are going to be better :P

http://www.myspace.com/headway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah blah blah, these guys are going to be better <img src='http://bobcaswell.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.myspace.com/headway" rel="nofollow">http://www.myspace.com/headway</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-11-30 &#171; Zero influence</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-11-30 &#171; Zero influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-918</guid>
		<description>[...] Radiohead Responds to Download Stats: Says They&#8217;re False &#124; TechConsumer Now I’m curious to know why Radiohead is uninterested in sharing. “People still downloading” is a weak excuse at best; the band could simply release numbers for the initial month of October. What do they have to hide? (tags: music radiohead marketing money interesting copyright business 2007)       Posted by zeroinfluencer Filed in del.icio.us links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radiohead Responds to Download Stats: Says They&#8217;re False | TechConsumer Now I’m curious to know why Radiohead is uninterested in sharing. “People still downloading” is a weak excuse at best; the band could simply release numbers for the initial month of October. What do they have to hide? (tags: music radiohead marketing money interesting copyright business 2007)       Posted by zeroinfluencer Filed in del.icio.us links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>ummmmm... Translation anyone? Que?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummmmm&#8230; Translation anyone? Que?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: las estadísticas de radiohead &#171; Suenadulce</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>las estadísticas de radiohead &#171; Suenadulce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-917</guid>
		<description>[...] único que sabemos hasta ahora es que todas las “estadísticas oficiales” son falsas. Apenas compré el disco supe que serian difíciles de estimar. Participé en la encuesta online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] único que sabemos hasta ahora es que todas las “estadísticas oficiales” son falsas. Apenas compré el disco supe que serian difíciles de estimar. Participé en la encuesta online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radiohead&#8217;s In Rainbows: the ultimate price discrimination &#171; Final Burp</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/comment-page-3/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Radiohead&#8217;s In Rainbows: the ultimate price discrimination &#171; Final Burp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/08/radiohead-responds-to-download-stats-says-theyre-false/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>[...] Now the first figures are coming, and supposedly 68% downloaded it for free,  while some 17% paid 1-4$, 6% paid 4-8, 12% paid 8-15$, and the remaining 4% paid more than 15$ (but Radiohead are denying these figures) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now the first figures are coming, and supposedly 68% downloaded it for free,  while some 17% paid 1-4$, 6% paid 4-8, 12% paid 8-15$, and the remaining 4% paid more than 15$ (but Radiohead are denying these figures) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

