<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Types of Net Neutrality: Good &amp; Evil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/</link>
	<description>Media consumer, tech enthusiast, and blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tadalafil</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>tadalafil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;tadalafil&lt;/strong&gt;

tadalafil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>tadalafil</strong></p>
<p>tadalafil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James C</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>James C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 23:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Thank&#039;s Bob C, for clarifying it for people who don&#039;t know.

It seems to me that average computer users &quot;i.e. non tech-savvy users&quot; will probably see those corporate funded sites which downplay net Neutrality.  Since most people don&#039;t understand how the Internet really is, they are probably very likely to follow the Large corporations&#039; viewpoints and the Internet will be a bad place for all. (ie google&#039;s content being slowed down because google didn&#039;t make a big payment to SBC or Verizon)

If tech-savvy people inform the general public about what Net-Neutrality is, then perhaps we can spare ourselves the cable-ization of the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank&#8217;s Bob C, for clarifying it for people who don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>It seems to me that average computer users &#8220;i.e. non tech-savvy users&#8221; will probably see those corporate funded sites which downplay net Neutrality.  Since most people don&#8217;t understand how the Internet really is, they are probably very likely to follow the Large corporations&#8217; viewpoints and the Internet will be a bad place for all. (ie google&#8217;s content being slowed down because google didn&#8217;t make a big payment to SBC or Verizon)</p>
<p>If tech-savvy people inform the general public about what Net-Neutrality is, then perhaps we can spare ourselves the cable-ization of the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob C.</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>iku,

Let me clarify:

Good Net Neutrality = Broadband providers inability to turn the Internet into something like cable TV.

Evil Net Neutrality = The FCC enforcing their vision of &quot;neutral&quot; upon Internet content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iku,</p>
<p>Let me clarify:</p>
<p>Good Net Neutrality = Broadband providers inability to turn the Internet into something like cable TV.</p>
<p>Evil Net Neutrality = The FCC enforcing their vision of &#8220;neutral&#8221; upon Internet content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iku</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>iku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Seems your title adds to the confusion more than clarifying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems your title adds to the confusion more than clarifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juicynote</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Juicynote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Two Types of Net Neutrality: Good  Evil&lt;/strong&gt;

Is this really the case? Are there senators and congressmen out there thinking that all this net neutrality fuss is about people wanting the FCC to regulate the internet?  This article brings up and interesting point, because knowing how government see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Two Types of Net Neutrality: Good  Evil</strong></p>
<p>Is this really the case? Are there senators and congressmen out there thinking that all this net neutrality fuss is about people wanting the FCC to regulate the internet?  This article brings up and interesting point, because knowing how government see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt h</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>matt h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>The fucks at the Fed level will certainly screw it up...WTF do a bunch of 55+ year old politicians know about the internet anyway...In 15 years they&#039;ll all be retired old folks who have dissappeared into obscurity and won&#039;t give a two shits about net neutrality.

This legislation is meant to &quot;CONTROL the flow&quot; of information and will be used in nefarious ways.

Leave the net free and open to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fucks at the Fed level will certainly screw it up&#8230;WTF do a bunch of 55+ year old politicians know about the internet anyway&#8230;In 15 years they&#8217;ll all be retired old folks who have dissappeared into obscurity and won&#8217;t give a two shits about net neutrality.</p>
<p>This legislation is meant to &#8220;CONTROL the flow&#8221; of information and will be used in nefarious ways.</p>
<p>Leave the net free and open to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoPilot</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoPilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Google and others should just slow down the response to any request coming through the backbone charging your site more.
And for those extorting backbone owners put a message saying &quot;your service is slower becuase XYZ doesn&#039;t provide an equal access to this website. Try another provider for faster performance.&quot;
After all if they can throttle pipelines you as a website owner like google can throttle content to those pipelines.

Also hand out mesh networking wirelss WIMAX routers to the population by the bucketful to ensure a free alternative wireless internet backbone not controlled by these corporate jerks like Tempe Arizona has.

GeoPilot
www.globalboiling.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google and others should just slow down the response to any request coming through the backbone charging your site more.<br />
And for those extorting backbone owners put a message saying &#8220;your service is slower becuase XYZ doesn&#8217;t provide an equal access to this website. Try another provider for faster performance.&#8221;<br />
After all if they can throttle pipelines you as a website owner like google can throttle content to those pipelines.</p>
<p>Also hand out mesh networking wirelss WIMAX routers to the population by the bucketful to ensure a free alternative wireless internet backbone not controlled by these corporate jerks like Tempe Arizona has.</p>
<p>GeoPilot<br />
<a href="http://www.globalboiling.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalboiling.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conte</title>
		<link>http://bobcaswell.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Conte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2006/06/09/two-types-of-net-neutrality-good-evil/#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Time to hit the streets?

god im pissed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to hit the streets?</p>
<p>god im pissed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

